In the Fall of 2011 US citizens were introduced to a protest
group calling itself Occupy Wall Street.
These protesters seemed to be divided into two groups within
the movement. The first group had valid
concerns while the second group seemed to protest because they had nothing
better to do.
Some had complaints regarding hardships and injustices
heaped upon themselves. The loss of
homes due to a faulty mortgage banking system as well as joblessness and a lack
of meaningful work opportunities are some of the valid issues found in this
first group.
Participants from the second group did not seem to have any
meaningful, coherent message. This group
responded with clichéd answers when asked why they were protesting. It seemed to me that they were a mob
searching for relevance. As time went
on, this group began to chant anti capitalist slogans. They claimed that they were entitled to take
over anyone’s home, yours or mine thus showing no regard for private property
rights. They showed and continue to show
little respect for public, communal property as well. Unfortunately, this second group seems to
have taken control of the movement.
As a group they are what Lenin would call ‘useful idiots’.
I find it disturbing that this movement is encouraged by
President Obama. I also wonder why the
protesters with valid complaints glommed onto this movement when a powerful
movement addressing many of the same issues already exists in the nonpartisan
Tea Party.
The Occupiers claim to represent 99% of all Americans. They do not represent my views.
No comments:
Post a Comment